OFAC Settles with Extreme Networks, Inc. for $1,529,685 over Nine Exports to Blocked Russian Defense Manufacturer MMZA

Key facts
EntityExtreme Networks, Inc.
CounterpartyJoint Stock Company (JSC) Moskovskiy Mashinostroitelniy Zavod Avangard (MMZA)
Date27 Oct 2026
StatusSettled
InstrumentSettlement Agreement; apparent violations of 31 C.F.R. § 589.201 (Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations)
Penalty$1,529,685

OFAC announced a $1,529,685 settlement with Extreme Networks, Inc. for nine apparent violations of the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations. Between September 2018 and March 2022, Extreme exported networking equipment and related services from the United States to JSC Moskovskiy Mashinostroitelniy Zavod Avangard (MMZA), a Russian defense manufacturer blocked by operation of law as majority-owned by designated JSC Concern Almaz Antey. The amount reflects OFAC’s determination that the apparent violations were voluntarily self-disclosed and egregious.

Who this affects

  • For exporters: Companies must conduct sufficient sanctions-related due diligence before acquiring a company or its assets and remain vigilant regarding sanctions risks thereafter, including oversight of foreign activities and operations.
  • For investors: Extreme’s obligation to pay a portion of the settlement amount will be deemed satisfied up to an equal amount of its payment of a fine to DOJ arising out of the same conduct.
  • For counsel/compliance: Extreme has established and will maintain for at least five years a sanctions compliance program, including hiring a Senior Product Counsel (or similar role), management commitment, risk assessment, and enhanced screening for entities majority-owned by a sanctioned party.
  • For policymakers: The action emphasizes U.S. foreign policy objectives to deny the Russian Federation’s ability to supply the military sectors of its economy and to degrade Russia’s capacity to wage war against Ukraine.

The read

The record centers on post-acquisition continuity of a customer relationship with a blocked person under the 50 percent rule. Extreme Russia acquired contracts naming MMZA as an end user in March 2018; Almaz Antey had been designated on July 16, 2014 under E.O. 13661, so MMZA was blocked at all relevant times. Subsequent purchase orders named Dmitrovskiy Experimental Mechanical Plant (DEMZ) as end user while containing MMZA email addresses, office addresses, or website references that Extreme’s screening did not resolve. OFAC’s framing treats the combination of M&A diligence gaps, intermediary red flags, and foreign-affiliate oversight as the operative pattern, not isolated transaction errors.

What was the action?

OFAC settled Extreme Networks, Inc.’s potential civil liability for nine apparent violations of § 589.201 of the Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations, 31 C.F.R. part 589. Between September 2018 and March 2022, Extreme exported hardware and software from the United States to MMZA.

What’s the penalty / scope, and how is it set?

The settlement amount is $1,529,685. OFAC determined the apparent violations were voluntarily self-disclosed and egregious; under the Enforcement Guidelines the base civil monetary penalty equaled one-half of the statutory maximum ($1,699,650). The final amount reflects consideration of the General Factors. A portion is satisfied by credit against an equal DOJ fine arising out of the same conduct. Extreme must maintain a sanctions compliance program for at least five years.

Who else is exposed?

Extreme Networks Rus LLC (former Russian subsidiary, which ceased operations in March 2022) and a third-party distributor that supplied end-user website responses and an end-user statement. DEMZ appears in the record as the named intermediary end user on the purchase orders. Not specified beyond these parties and the pattern of majority-owned blocked entities.

What happens next

Extreme maintains the sanctions compliance program and associated measures for at least five years following the Agreement’s execution date, including the Senior Product Counsel role and enhanced screening. OFAC coordinated the action with the Department of Justice’s parallel resolution of the same conduct. Residual exposure for related parties or further interagency outcomes remains the open question on the record.

Long-tail keywords: Extreme Networks OFAC settlement 2026 $1,529,685, MMZA Almaz Antey 50 percent rule sanctions, Ukraine-/Russia-Related Sanctions Regulations 31 CFR 589.201, Extreme Networks Rus LLC MMZA exports, OFAC egregious voluntary self-disclosure networking equipment, DEMZ intermediary end-user red flags OFAC, Extreme Networks five-year sanctions compliance program.

Source of record
The settlement amount reflects OFAC’s determination that Extreme’s apparent violations were egregious and voluntarily self-disclosed.
OFAC Enforcement Release, 2026 →
Chip War — Control — the running record
Narracomm · The Record

Chip War — Control

The rules: every export control, Entity List add, licence, and counter-control reshaping advanced computing — read from the primary, including the non-English ones.

Updated 30 Oct 2026 · Links open our coverage; primaries are cited there
Headline CompanyRegion DateCoverage
OFAC Settles with Extreme Networks, Inc. for $1,529,685 over Nine Exports to Blocked Russian Defense Manufacturer MMZA — — 28 Oct 2026 Read More →
BIS Renews Temporary Denial of Export Privileges Against Mahan Airways and Related Parties for One Year — — 28 Oct 2026 Read More →
EU Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/2279 designates 1,569 Russian military-industrial suppliers — Europe / DACH 12 Oct 2026 Read More →
China and EU Form 16-Point Consensus at Beijing Trade and Investment Consultation Meeting — China & Restricted 10 Oct 2026 Read More →
MOFCOM Announcement No. 44 Opens Anti-Dumping Investigation into EU-Origin p-Nitrotoluene — China & Restricted 7 Oct 2026 Read More →
MOFCOM Comments on Reported Franco-German Request for Stronger EU Trade-Defense Tools — Europe / DACH 7 Oct 2026 Read More →
Japan Implements New Sanctions Under Foreign Exchange Act: 42 Entities and Individuals, 35 Vessels Affected Garantex Europe OU U.S. & Allies 5 Oct 2026 Read More →
Stanley Yi Zheng, Matthew Kelly, Tommy Shad English Charged with Conspiring to Smuggle Export-Controlled AI Servers to China via Thailand — China & Restricted 3 Oct 2026 Read More →
Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 and restates more than $300 million in milestone-contingent orders as of May 2026 Agility Robotics U.S. & Allies 15 Sep 2026 Read More →
Figure announces $3.5 billion Nscale partnership for up to 100,000 NVIDIA Vera Rubin GPUs, Barstow deployment targeted for H2 2027 Figure U.S. & Allies 3 Sep 2026 Read More →
BIS Removes Two Hong Kong Addresses for Arrow Electronics (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd. From the Entity List, Effective 21 August 2026 Arrow Electronics U.S. & Allies 24 Aug 2026 Read More →
BIS Removes the UAE From Country Groups D:3 and D:4, Adds A:5, and Limits License-Free Advanced Computing to Named Parties in Supplement No. 8 — U.S. & Allies 10 Jul 2026 Read More →
BIS settles with Robert Bosch GmbH for $36,184,680 over unlicensed MEMS and software shipments to Huawei Robert Bosch Gmbh — 17 Jun 2026 Read More →
BIS Guidance of May 31, 2026: License Still Required for Advanced Computing Items to Country Group D:5 and Macau-Headquartered Entities — — 31 May 2026 Read More →
BIS moves the authorized IC-designer trigger and approved-designer application deadline from April 13, 2026 to December 31, 2026 (91 FR 17851, RIN 0694-AJ98) — — 9 Apr 2026 Read More →
BIS final rule 91 FR 1684 moves NVIDIA H200 and AMD MI325X U.S. exports to China and Macau from presumption of denial to case-by-case review Nvidia — 15 Jan 2026 Read More →
BIS final rule 91 FR 1684 moves NVIDIA H200 and AMD MI325X U.S. exports to China and Macau from presumption of denial to case-by-case review Nvidia — 15 Jan 2026 Read More →
Last updated 28 Oct 2026 · Narracomm · The Record · every figure cites its primary above.